Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author McCubbing, Dustin C.
dc.contributor.author Shan, Gongbing
dc.contributor.author Gonzalez, Claudia L. R.
dc.contributor.author Awosoga, Olu A.
dc.contributor.author Doan, Jon B.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-05-29T22:42:59Z
dc.date.available 2019-05-29T22:42:59Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation McCubbing, D. C., Shan, G., Gonzalez, C. L. R., Awosoga, O. A., & Doan, J. B. (2015). Perception of safe horizontal reaching distance changes with repetitive occupational loading in novice lifters. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 4542-4549. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10133/5373
dc.description Sherpa Romeo blue journal. Open access article. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) applies. en_US
dc.description.abstract Safe work behaviours rely on accurate perceptions of injury risks, and workers who have a misperception of risk can be injured. Despite the importance of perception-action coupling, little is known about modification of those perceptions with changing physical or cognitive STATE. It is hypothesized that changing values for perceived affordances could evidence these modifications. A better understanding of how worker characteristics (e.g., level of fatigue) affect perceptions of affordance and their corresponding behaviours, may help when developing strategies for ergonomic best practices, particularly in manual material handling (MMH) activities. The aim of this study was to compare safe perceptions of affordance from workers that completed repetitive STATE loading. Seventy-five novice MMH workers (23 male; mean age = 21.43, SD = 3.24) made perceived affordances of their safest horizontal reaching distance (acceptable limit) to complete a model task. STATE loading consisted of physical or cognitive fatigue or a control. The levels of fatigue were assessed at five-minute intervals using Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) values and Multi-Fatigue Inventory (MFI) values, respectively. A significant main effect of TIME indicated a decrease of perceived safest reaching distance observed from baseline through subsequent measurements (p<.001). The magnitude of these changes did not differ significantly between groups, suggesting that general learning more than specific STATE loading may be a major contributor to modification of affordance perceptions. However, it remains important to consider TIME and STATE influences on perceptions for safe occupational handling. Novice workers’ initial perceptions of safe working affordance may put them at risk for soft tissue injury. Physical and cognitive loading similarly affect perceived safe affordances. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.subject Affordance en_US
dc.subject Perception of safety en_US
dc.subject Physical fatigue en_US
dc.subject Cognitive fatigue en_US
dc.subject Manual materials handling en_US
dc.subject Ergonomics en_US
dc.subject Human factors en_US
dc.subject Reaching
dc.subject Workplace injury
dc.subject.lcsh Human engineering
dc.subject.lcsh Risk perception
dc.subject.lcsh Mental fatigue
dc.subject.lcsh Fatigue
dc.subject.lcsh Lifting and carrying--Safety measures
dc.title Perception of safe horizontal reaching distance changes with repetitive occupational loading in novice lifters en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.publisher.faculty Arts and Science en_US
dc.publisher.faculty Health Sciences en_US
dc.publisher.department Department of Kinesiology en_US
dc.description.peer-review Yes en_US
dc.publisher.institution University of Lethbridge en_US
dc.publisher.url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.470


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record